The ALMA detection of CO rotational line emission in AGB stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud

TL;DR

This study used ALMA to spectrally resolve CO emission in AGB stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud, measuring expansion velocities and mass-loss rates, revealing lower velocities but similar mass-loss rates compared to Galactic stars.

Contribution

First spectroscopic measurements of CO emission in extragalactic AGB stars, providing new insights into their wind velocities and mass-loss rates in the LMC.

Findings

Expansion velocities in LMC carbon stars are lower than in the Milky Way.

Mass-loss rates are similar between LMC and Galactic carbon stars.

Gas-to-dust ratios suggest underestimated CO abundance or variable mass loss.

Abstract

Context: Low- and intermediate-mass stars lose most of their stellar mass at the end of their lives on the asymptotic giant branch (AGB). Determining gas and dust mass-loss rates (MLRs) is important in quantifying the contribution of evolved stars to the enrichment of the interstellar medium. Aims: Attempt to, for the first time, spectrally resolve CO thermal line emission in a small sample of AGB stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Methods: ALMA was used to observe 2 OH/IR stars and 4 carbon stars in the LMC in the CO J= 2-1 line. Results: We present the first measurement of expansion velocities in extragalactic carbon stars. All four C-stars are detected and wind expansion velocities and stellar velocities are directly measured. Mass-loss rates are derived from modelling the spectral energy distribution and Spitzer/IRS spectrum with the DUSTY code. Gas-to-dust ratios are derived that make the predicted velocities agree with the observed ones. The expansion velocities and MLRs are compared to a Galactic sample of well-studied relatively low MLRs stars supplemented with "extreme" C-stars that have properties more similar to the LMC targets. Gas MLRs derived from a simple formula are significantly smaller than derived from the dust modelling, indicating an order of magnitude underestimate of the estimated CO abundance, time-variable mass loss, or that the CO intensities in LMC stars are lower than predicted by the formula derived for Galactic objects. This could be related to a stronger interstellar radiation field in the LMC. Conclusions: Although the LMC sample is small and the comparison to Galactic stars is non-trivial because of uncertainties in their distances it appears that for C stars the wind expansion velocities in the LMC are lower than in the solar neighbourhood, while the MLRs appear similar. This is in agreement with dynamical dust-driven wind models.