Probability of Physical Association of 104 Blended Companions to \textit{Kepler} Objects of Interest Using Visible and Near-Infrared Adaptive Optics Photometry
Dani Atkinson, Christoph Baranec, Carl Ziegler, Nicholas Law, and Tim, Morton

TL;DR
This study assesses the likelihood that blended companions to Kepler Objects of Interest are physically associated, using adaptive optics photometry, to improve false positive estimates and inform planet formation models.
Contribution
It introduces two methods for calculating photometric parallax to determine physical association of companions, providing new insights into false positives in Kepler data.
Findings
14.5% of companions are likely unassociated with primaries
No increased association likelihood for companions within 1 arcsecond
2.6% of transits suggest large planet radii over 15 Earth radii
Abstract
We determine probabilities of physical association for stars in blended Kepler Objects of Interest, and find that of companions within are consistent with being physically unassociated with their primary. This produces a better understanding of potential false positives in the Kepler catalog and will guide models of planet formation in binary systems. Physical association is determined through two methods of calculating multi-band photometric parallax using visible and near-infrared adaptive optics observation of 84 KOI systems with 104 contaminating companions within . We find no evidence that KOI companions with separation of less than are more likely to be physically associated than KOI companions generally. We also reinterpret transit depths for 94 planet candidates, and calculate that of transits…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
