Local and Union Boxicity
Thomas Bl\"asius, Peter Stumpf, Torsten Ueckerdt

TL;DR
This paper introduces local and union boxicity, new graph parameters related to intersection representations with axis-aligned boxes, and explores their properties and relationships to classical boxicity.
Contribution
It defines local and union boxicity, establishes inequalities among them and classical boxicity, and shows their characterizations via intersection representations, highlighting their potential to better indicate graph complexity.
Findings
Local and union boxicity are bounded by classical boxicity.
These parameters can differ arbitrarily far from each other.
Local boxicity may better reflect graph complexity.
Abstract
The boxicity of a graph is the smallest integer such that is the intersection of interval graphs, or equivalently, that is the intersection graph of axis-aligned boxes in . These intersection representations can be interpreted as covering representations of the complement of with co-interval graphs, that is, complements of interval graphs. We follow the recent framework of global, local and folded covering numbers (Knauer and Ueckerdt, Discrete Mathematics 339 (2016)) to define two new parameters: the local boxicity and the union boxicity of . The union boxicity of is the smallest such that can be covered with vertex-disjoint unions of co-interval graphs, while the local boxicity of is the smallest such that can be covered…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Graph theory and applications · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
