Conservation of Charge and Conservation of Current
Bob Eisenberg

TL;DR
This paper discusses the relationship between charge and current conservation, emphasizing the importance of explicitly enforcing current conservation in models of complex fluids and environments to improve accuracy and numerical stability.
Contribution
It provides a universal derivation of current conservation and advocates for its explicit inclusion in models of charge movement in non-ideal materials.
Findings
Classical models often fail to conserve current.
Enforcing current conservation can prevent numerical artifacts.
Explicit conservation laws improve modeling accuracy.
Abstract
Conservation of current and conservation of charge are nearly the same thing: when enough is known about charge movement, conservation of current can be derived from conservation of charge, in ideal dielectrics, for example. Conservation of current is enforced implicitly in ideal dielectrics by theories that conserve charge. But charge movement in real materials like semiconductors or ionic solutions is never ideal. We present an apparently universal derivation of conservation of current and advocate using that conservation law explicitly as a distinct part of theories and calculations of charge movement in complex fluids and environments. Classical models using ordinary differential equations rarely satisfy conservation of current, including the chemical kinetic models implementing the law of mass action and Markov models. These models must be amended if they are to conserve current.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElectrochemical Analysis and Applications · Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation · Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
