Simultaneous Explanation of the $R_K$ and $R_{D^{(*)}}$ Puzzles: a Model Analysis
Bhubanjyoti Bhattacharya, Alakabha Datta, Jean-Pascal Gu\'evin, David, London, and Ryoutaro Watanabe

TL;DR
This paper analyzes two new physics models, vector boson and leptoquark, to explain B-decay anomalies, assessing their viability and predicting measurable signals at Belle II and LHCb.
Contribution
It provides a detailed individual examination of the vector boson and leptoquark models, including their constraints and distinctive experimental signatures.
Findings
VB model is barely viable due to mixing and decay constraints.
VB predicts tau to 3 mu decay at a measurable rate.
U1 model predicts a potentially observable Upsilon to mu tau decay.
Abstract
and are two -decay measurements that presently exhibit discrepancies with the SM. Recently, using an effective field theory approach, it was demonstrated that a new-physics model can simultaneously explain both the and puzzles. There are two UV completions that can give rise to the effective Lagrangian: (i) : a vector boson that transforms as an triplet, as in the SM, (ii) : an -singlet vector leptoquark. In this paper, we examine these models individually. A key point is that contributes to - mixing and , while does not. We show that, when constraints from these processes are taken into account, the model is just barely viable. It predicts . This is measurable at Belle II and LHCb, and therefore…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
