Where does the X(5568) structure come from?
Zhi Yang, Qian Wang, Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether the observed X(5568) structure is a genuine particle or a kinematic reflection caused by specific interaction effects and experimental conditions, providing a method to distinguish between these scenarios.
Contribution
The study proposes that the X(5568) signal may result from kinematic reflections rather than a new particle, offering a way to differentiate between genuine states and reflection effects in experimental data.
Findings
The X(5568) structure can be explained as a kinematic reflection rather than a new particle.
The reflection depends on the specific interaction form and experimental cuts.
Future analyses can distinguish genuine states from reflections by examining invariant mass distributions and cone cut dependencies.
Abstract
We study the semi-exclusive production of pairs in hadron colliders which is associated with the structure observed by the D0 Collaboration in 2016, but that was not confirmed by LHCb and CMS later. The reason of its appearance in the D0 and absence in LHCb and CMS is discussed in this letter. In a semi-exclusive process, one might miss the third particle which is produced together with the simultaneously. In the three-body Dalitz plot, once the remaining region is narrow enough after the kinematic cuts, its reflection to another invariant mass distribution will accumulate a large number of events within a specific energy region. If there is an enhancement in the remaining region, it will make the reflection structure more pronounced. The precise line shape of the reflection will depend on the specific interaction form. A combined study of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
