A framework for testing leptonic unitarity by neutrino oscillation experiments
Chee Sheng Fong, Hisakazu Minakata, Hiroshi Nunokawa

TL;DR
This paper develops a nearly model-independent framework to test low-scale leptonic unitarity violation using neutrino oscillation experiments, distinguishing it from high-scale violations through characteristic features like flavor universality and zero-distance transitions.
Contribution
It introduces a framework that isolates low-scale unitarity violation effects in neutrino oscillations, independent of sterile sector details, and proposes experimental constraints using JUNO-like setups.
Findings
The oscillation probability becomes insensitive to sterile sector details for mass squared differences ≥ 0.1 eV².
Presence of a constant leaking probability distinguishes low-scale from high-scale unitarity violation.
Potential modifications due to matter effects are discussed at first order.
Abstract
If leptonic unitarity is violated by new physics at an energy scale much lower than the electroweak scale, which we call low-scale unitarity violation, it has different characteristic features from those expected in unitarity violation at high-energy scales. They include maintaining flavor universality and absence of zero-distance flavor transition. We present a framework for testing such unitarity violation at low energies by neutrino oscillation experiments. Starting from the unitary 3 active plus (arbitrary integer) sterile neutrino model we show that by restricting the active-sterile and sterile-sterile neutrino mass squared differences to 0.1 eV the oscillation probability in the model becomes insensitive to details of the sterile sector, providing a nearly model-independent framework for testing low-scale unitarity violation. Yet, the presence of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
