Uplink Performance Analysis of Dense Cellular Networks with LoS and NLoS Transmissions

TL;DR

This paper analyzes uplink coverage and spectral efficiency in dense small cell networks considering realistic LoS/NLoS models, user association, and spatial correlations, revealing that lower power compensation can enhance performance in dense deployments.

Contribution

It introduces a practical user association strategy, models BSs and UEs as independent Poisson processes, and considers spatial correlation, providing more accurate uplink performance analysis.

Findings

LoS/NLoS differentiation significantly affects ASE.

Lower UL power compensation boosts ASE in dense networks.

Existing models overestimate benefits of higher power compensation.

Abstract

In this paper, we analyse the coverage probability and the area spectral efficiency (ASE) for the uplink (UL) of dense small cell networks (SCNs) considering a practical path loss model incorporating both line-of-sight (LoS) and non-line-of-sight (NLoS) transmissions. Compared with the existing work, we adopt the following novel approaches in our study: (i) we assume a practical user association strategy (UAS) based on the smallest path loss, or equivalently the strongest received signal strength; (ii) we model the positions of both base stations (BSs) and the user equipments (UEs) as two independent Homogeneous Poisson point processes (HPPPs); and (iii) the correlation of BSs' and UEs' positions is considered, thus making our analytical results more accurate. The performance impact of LoS and NLoS transmissions on the ASE for the UL of dense SCNs is shown to be significant, both quantitatively and qualitatively, compared with existing work that does not differentiate LoS and NLoS transmissions. In particular, existing work predicted that a larger UL power compensation factor would always result in a better ASE in the practical range of BS density, i.e., 10^1-10^3 BSs/km^2. However, our results show that a smaller UL power compensation factor can greatly boost the ASE in the UL of dense SCNs, i.e., 10^2-10^3 BSs/km^2, while a larger UL power compensation factor is more suitable for sparse SCNs, i.e., 10^1-10^2 BSs/km^2.