Sea-level projections representing deeply uncertain ice-sheet contributions
Alexander M.R. Bakker, Tony E. Wong, Kelsey L. Ruckert, Klaus, Keller

TL;DR
This paper presents probabilistic sea-level rise projections that account for deeply uncertain Antarctic ice sheet contributions, highlighting their potential dominance in future sea-level rise and the need for robust adaptive strategies.
Contribution
It introduces a set of probabilistic projections that incorporate deeply uncertain Antarctic ice sheet behavior, emphasizing the importance of considering these uncertainties in decision-making.
Findings
Deep uncertainties in Antarctic ice sheet contributions can dominate sea-level rise projections within decades.
Projections show high sensitivity to controversial assumptions about ice sheet stability.
Robust adaptive strategies are necessary to manage the risks posed by these uncertainties.
Abstract
Future sea-level rise poses nontrivial risks for many coastal communities. Managing these risks often relies on consensus projections like those provided by the IPCC. Yet, there is a growing awareness that the surrounding uncertainties may be much larger than typically perceived. Recently published sea-level projections appear widely divergent and highly sensitive to non-trivial model choices and the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) may be much less stable than previously believed, enabling a rapid disintegration. In response, some agencies have already announced to update their projections accordingly. Here, we present a set of probabilistic sea-level projections that approximate deeply uncertain WAIS contributions. The projections aim to inform robust decisions by clarifying the sensitivity to non-trivial or controversial assumptions. We show that the deeply uncertain WAIS contribution…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
