Superstability from categoricity in abstract elementary classes
Will Boney, Rami Grossberg, Monica M. VanDieren, Sebastien Vasey

TL;DR
This paper generalizes a result linking categoricity to superstability-like properties in abstract elementary classes, using a broad notion of independence and weakening amalgamation assumptions, with a proof valid in ZFC.
Contribution
It extends previous results by establishing superstability properties from categoricity under a general independence notion and weaker amalgamation, filling a gap in earlier proofs.
Findings
Superstability-like property derived from categoricity
Generalized independence notion satisfies superstability
Proof valid within ZFC, no additional set-theoretic assumptions
Abstract
Starting from an abstract elementary class with no maximal models, Shelah and Villaveces have shown (assuming instances of diamond) that categoricity implies a superstability-like property for a certain independence relation called nonsplitting. We generalize their result as follows: given an abstract notion of independence for Galois (orbital) types over models, we derive that the notion satisfies a superstability property provided that the class is categorical and satisfies a weakening of amalgamation. This extends the Shelah-Villaveces result (the independence notion there was splitting) as well as a result of the first and second author where the independence notion was coheir. The argument is in ZFC and fills a gap in the Shelah-Villaveces proof.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
