On the difference between gamma-ray-detected and non-gamma-ray-detected pulsars
Simon C. Rookyard, Patrick Weltevrede, Simon Johnston, Matthew Kerr

TL;DR
This study compares radio profiles of young pulsars with and without gamma-ray detection, revealing differences linked to energy loss and viewing geometry, and supporting current emission models.
Contribution
It demonstrates that pulsar gamma-ray detectability depends on energy loss rate and viewing angle, providing insights into pulsar emission geometry and model validation.
Findings
Non-gamma-ray pulsars have wider radio profiles.
Radio profile width correlates with gamma-ray peak separation.
Differences in detectability relate to viewing geometry and energy loss.
Abstract
We compare radio profile widths of young, energetic gamma-ray-detected and non-gamma-ray-detected pulsars. We find that the latter typically have wider radio profiles, with the boundary between the two samples exhibiting a dependence on the rate of rotational energy loss. We also find that within the sample of gamma-ray-detected pulsars, radio profile width is correlated with both the separation of the main gamma-ray peaks and the presence of narrow gamma-ray components. These findings lead us to propose that these pulsars form a single population where the main factors determining gamma ray detectability are the rate of rotational energy loss and the proximity of the line of sight to the rotation axis. The expected magnetic inclination angle distribution will be different for radio pulsars with and without detectable gamma rays, naturally leading to the observed differences. Our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
