Multiple testing via relative belief ratios
Michael Evans, Jabed Tomal

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method for multiple testing using relative belief ratios, providing a measure of evidence that is advantageous for assessing sparsity without restrictive priors.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel multiple testing approach based on relative belief ratios, offering a flexible and evidence-based method for assessing sparsity in large-scale inference.
Findings
Effective in large-scale inference problems
Does not require restrictive prior assumptions
Provides a measure of statistical evidence
Abstract
Some large scale inference problems are considered based on using the relative belief ratio as a measure of statistical evidence. This approach is applied to the multiple testing problem. A particular application of this is concerned with assessing sparsity. The approach taken to sparsity has several advantages as it is based on a measure of evidence and does not require that the prior be restricted in any way.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models · Statistical Methods and Inference · Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
