Spectroscopy of candidate electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational wave sources
Iain A Steele, Chris M Copperwheat, Andrzej S Piascik

TL;DR
This paper discusses a coordinated multi-wavelength follow-up program for gravitational wave events, demonstrating the ability to eliminate most false optical counterparts, though some candidates remain unclassified.
Contribution
It presents a systematic approach to electromagnetic follow-up of GW sources and highlights the challenges in classifying all candidates.
Findings
Most candidates were supernovae at similar redshifts
No electromagnetic counterparts were confirmed for black hole mergers
A significant fraction of candidates remain unclassified
Abstract
A programme of worldwide, multi-wavelength electromagnetic follow-up of sources detected by gravitational wave detectors is in place. Following the discovery of GW150914 and GW151226, wide field imaging of their sky localisations identified a number of candidate optical counterparts which were then spectrally classified. The majority of candidates were found to be supernovae at redshift ranges similar to the GW events and were thereby ruled out as a genuine counterpart. Other candidates ruled out include AGN and solar system objects. Given the GW sources were black hole binary mergers, the lack of an identified electromagnetic counterpart is not surprising. However the observations show that is it is possible to organise and execute a campaign that can eliminate the majority of potential counterparts. Finally we note the existence of a "classification gap" with a significant fraction of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
