The stellar mass - size relation for cluster galaxies at z=1 with high angular resolution from the Gemini/GeMS multi-conjugate adaptive optics system
Sarah M. Sweet, Robert Sharp, Karl Glazebrook, Francois Rigaut,, Eleazar R. Carrasco, Mark Brodwin, Matthew Bayliss, Brian Stalder, Roberto, Abraham, Peter McGregor

TL;DR
This study measures the stellar mass - size relation of 49 cluster galaxies at z=1 using high-resolution adaptive optics imaging, revealing size evolution consistent with previous findings and emphasizing the importance of wavelength and resolution in such measurements.
Contribution
First measurement of the stellar mass - size relation in a galaxy cluster at z=1 with sub-kpc resolution using adaptive optics, highlighting the impact of wavelength and resolution on the relation.
Findings
Size evolution proportional to (1+z)^-1.25
Slope of the relation is consistent with local universe
AO imaging is essential for accurate size measurements
Abstract
We present the stellar mass - size relation for 49 galaxies within the = 1.067 cluster SPT-CL J05465345, with FWHM 80-120 mas -band data from the Gemini multi-conjugate adaptive optics system (GeMS/GSAOI). This is the first such measurement in a cluster environment, performed at sub-kpc resolution at rest-frame wavelengths dominated by the light of the underlying old stellar populations. The observed stellar mass - size relation is offset from the local relation by 0.21 dex, corresponding to a size evolution proportional to , consistent with the literature. The slope of the stellar mass - size relation = 0.74 0.06, consistent with the local relation. The absence of slope evolution indicates that the amount of size growth is constant with stellar mass. This suggests that galaxies in massive clusters such as SPT-CL J05465345 grow…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
