Unboundedness Theorems for Symbols Adapted to Large Subspaces
Robert M. Kesler

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that certain multilinear operators and multipliers, even when adapted to specific subspaces or symbols, do not satisfy any $L^p$ estimates, revealing fundamental unboundedness in these advanced harmonic analysis constructs.
Contribution
The paper establishes new unboundedness results for multilinear operators and multipliers adapted to subspaces and symbols, extending previous work and providing explicit counterexamples.
Findings
No $L^p$ estimates for the n-sublinear generalization of the Bi-Carleson operator when $oldsymbol{oldsymbol{eta} eq 0}$.
Existence of symbols adapted to hyperplanes with no $L^p$ bounds for certain multilinear multipliers.
Construction of specific symbols and operators that fail to satisfy $L^p$ estimates, including paraproducts and Riesz kernel-based multipliers.
Abstract
For every integer , we prove that the n-sublinear generalization of the Bi-Carleson operator of Muscalu, Tao, and Thiele given by nC^{\vec{\alpha}} :(f_1,..., f_n) \mapsto \sup_{M} \left| \int_{\vec{\xi} \cdot \vec{\alpha} >0, \xi_n < M} \left[\prod_{j=1}^n \hat{f}_j(\xi_j) e^{2 \pi i x \xi_j }\right]d\vec{\xi} ~\right|satisfies no estimates provided with distinct, non-zero entries. Furthermore, if and has distinct, non-zero entries, it is shown that there is a symbol adapted to the hyperplane and supported in for which the associated -linear multiplier also satisfies no …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
