On the relative power of reduction notions in arithmetic circuit complexity
Christian Ikenmeyer, Stefan Mengel

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that p-projections and c-reductions differ in power within arithmetic circuit complexity by showing certain polynomials are VNP-complete under c-reductions but not p-projections, with results depending on the field.
Contribution
It establishes the fundamental difference in power between p-projections and c-reductions in arithmetic circuit complexity and explores the field dependence of VNP-completeness.
Findings
Existence of polynomials VNP-complete under c-reductions but not p-projections
Unconditional separation of reduction notions
Field dependence of VNP-completeness
Abstract
We show that the two main reduction notions in arithmetic circuit complexity, p-projections and c-reductions, differ in power. We do so by showing unconditionally that there are polynomials that are VNP-complete under c-reductions but not under p-projections. We also show that the question of which polynomials are VNP-complete under which type of reductions depends on the underlying field.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · semigroups and automata theory · Advanced Graph Theory Research
