Determinacy from strong compactness of $\omega_1$
Nam Trang, Trevor Wilson

TL;DR
This paper explores how certain large cardinal-like properties of in the absence of Choice relate to determinacy axioms, establishing equiconsistency results with being strongly compact or supercompact under these axioms.
Contribution
It establishes the equiconsistency of 's strong compactness and supercompactness with determinacy axioms in + C, linking set-theoretic properties to determinacy hypotheses.
Findings
's -strong compactness is equiconsistent with .
's --strong compactness is equiconsistent with _.
's --supercompactness is slightly stronger than _ + C.
Abstract
In the absence of the Axiom of Choice, the "small" cardinal can exhibit properties more usually associated with large cardinals, such as strong compactness and supercompactness. For a local version of strong compactness, we say that is -strongly compact (where is any set) if there is a fine, countably complete measure on . Working in , we prove that the -strong compactness and -strong compactness of are equiconsistent with and respectively, where denotes the Axiom of Determinacy and denotes the Axiom of Real Determinacy. The -supercompactness of is shown to be slightly stronger than ,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis
