Permutation and Grouping Methods for Sharpening Gaussian Process Approximations
Joseph Guinness

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that optimizing the ordering and grouping of observations in Gaussian process approximations significantly improves accuracy and reduces computational costs, challenging the assumption that default orderings are optimal.
Contribution
It introduces automatic grouping methods and shows that random orderings can outperform default coordinate-based orderings in Gaussian process likelihood approximations.
Findings
Reordering observations can drastically improve approximation accuracy.
Grouping calculations reduces computational burden and enhances quality.
Random orderings often outperform default coordinate-based orderings.
Abstract
Vecchia's approximate likelihood for Gaussian process parameters depends on how the observations are ordered, which can be viewed as a deficiency because the exact likelihood is permutation-invariant. This article takes the alternative standpoint that the ordering of the observations can be tuned to sharpen the approximations. Advantageously chosen orderings can drastically improve the approximations, and in fact, completely random orderings often produce far more accurate approximations than default coordinate-based orderings do. In addition to the permutation results, automatic methods for grouping calculations of components of the approximation are introduced, having the result of simultaneously improving the quality of the approximation and reducing its computational burden. In common settings, reordering combined with grouping reduces Kullback-Leibler divergence from the target…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
