Should Terminology Principles be re-examined?
Christophe Roche

TL;DR
This paper re-examines traditional terminology principles by integrating advances in logic and ontology, proposing a formalized approach called ontoterminology for better computational implementation.
Contribution
It introduces a dual perspective on terminology principles, combining epistemology and logic, and proposes the concept of ontoterminology as a formal ontology-based approach.
Findings
Revisiting terminology principles with logic and epistemology.
Introducing the concept of ontoterminology.
Highlighting issues in computational implementation of terminology.
Abstract
Operationalization of terminology for IT applications has revived the Wusterian approach. The conceptual dimension once more prevails after taking back seat to specialised lexicography. This is demonstrated by the emergence of ontology in terminology. While the Terminology Principles as defined in Felber manual and the ISO standards remain at the core of traditional terminology, their computational implementation raises some issues. In this article, while reiterating their importance, we will be re-examining these Principles from a dual perspective: that of logic in the mathematical sense of the term and that of epistemology as in the theory of knowledge. We will thus be clarifying and describing some of them so as to take into account advances in knowledge engineering (ontology) and formal systems (logic). The notion of ontoterminology, terminology whose conceptual system is a formal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicslinguistics and terminology studies · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Lexicography and Language Studies
