Fragmentation Kinematics in Comet 332P/Ikeya-Murakami
David Jewitt, Max Mutchler, Harold Weaver, Man-To Hui, Jessica, Agarwal, Masateru Ishiguro, Jan Kleyna, Jing Li, Karen Meech, Marco Micheli,, Richard Wainscoat, and Robert Weryk

TL;DR
This study uses Hubble observations to analyze the fragmentation process of comet 332P/Ikeya-Murakami, revealing details about fragment sizes, ejection times, and the nucleus's smaller-than-expected size and mass, suggesting rotational instability influences fragmentation.
Contribution
First detailed time-resolved analysis of comet 332P/Ikeya-Murakami's fragmentation, estimating smaller nucleus size and mass, and highlighting rotational instability as a key factor.
Findings
Fragments recede at 0.06 to 3.5 m/s with ejection times in late 2015.
Small fragments are less abundant than expected from a simple power-law distribution.
Nucleus radius estimated at ≤275 m, much smaller than previous estimates.
Abstract
We present initial time-resolved observations of the split comet 332P/Ikeya-Murakami taken using the Hubble Space Telescope. Our images reveal a dust-bathed cluster of fragments receding from their parent nucleus at projected speeds in the range 0.06 to 3.5 m s from which we estimate ejection times from October to December 2015. The number of fragments with effective radii 20 m follows a differential power law with index = -3.60.6, while smaller fragments are less abundant than expected from an extrapolation of this power-law. We argue that, in addition to losses due to observational selection, torques from anisotropic outgassing are capable of destroying the small fragments by driving them quickly to rotational instability. Specifically, the spin-up times of fragments 20 m in radius are shorter than the time elapsed since ejection from the parent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
