Star Formation Quenching Timescale of Central Galaxies in a Hierarchical Universe

TL;DR

This study models the quenching timescales of central galaxies using simulations and observations, revealing mass-dependent rapidity in star formation cessation and differences from satellite galaxies, informing galaxy evolution theories.

Contribution

It introduces a combined simulation-observation framework to constrain central galaxy quenching timescales across stellar masses, highlighting faster quenching in more massive galaxies.

Findings

Quenching e-folding times range from 1.5 to 0.5 Gyr across stellar masses.

More massive central galaxies quench faster than less massive ones.

Central galaxies take about 4 Gyr to migrate from star-forming to quiescent state.

Abstract

Central galaxies make up the majority of the galaxy population, including the majority of the quiescent population at $\mathcal{M}_* > 10^{10}\mathrm{M}_\odot$. Thus, the mechanism(s) responsible for quenching central galaxies plays a crucial role in galaxy evolution as whole. We combine a high resolution cosmological $N$-body simulation with observed evolutionary trends of the "star formation main sequence," quiescent fraction, and stellar mass function at $z < 1$ to construct a model that statistically tracks the star formation histories and quenching of central galaxies. Comparing this model to the distribution of central galaxy star formation rates in a group catalog of the SDSS Data Release 7, we constrain the timescales over which physical processes cease star formation in central galaxies. Over the stellar mass range $10^{9.5}$ to $10^{11} \mathrm{M}_\odot$ we infer quenching e-folding times that span $1.5$ to $0.5\; \mathrm{Gyr}$ with more massive central galaxies quenching faster. For $\mathcal{M}_* = 10^{10.5}\mathrm{M}_\odot$, this implies a total migration time of $\sim 4~\mathrm{Gyrs}$ from the star formation main sequence to quiescence. Compared to satellites, central galaxies take $\sim 2~\mathrm{Gyrs}$ longer to quench their star formation, suggesting that different mechanisms are responsible for quenching centrals versus satellites. Finally, the central galaxy quenching timescale we infer provides key constraints for proposed star formation quenching mechanisms. Our timescale is generally consistent with gas depletion timescales predicted by quenching through strangulation. However, the exact physical mechanism(s) responsible for this still remain unclear.