Constraining the Frequency of Free-Floating Planets from a Synthesis of Microlensing, Radial Velocity, and Direct Imaging Survey Results
Christian Clanton, B. Scott Gaudi

TL;DR
This study combines microlensing, radial velocity, and direct imaging data to estimate that roughly 58-67% of short-timescale microlensing events are caused by free-floating planets, suggesting they are common in our galaxy.
Contribution
It provides the first integrated analysis constraining free-floating planet frequency using multiple survey results and models their contribution to microlensing event excess.
Findings
Approximately 58-67% of short-timescale microlensing events are due to free-floating planets.
Estimated 1.2-1.4 free-floating planets per main-sequence star.
Bound planets alone cannot account for the entire excess of short-timescale events.
Abstract
A microlensing survey by Sumi et al. (2011) exhibits an overabundance of short-timescale events (STEs; t_E<2 days) relative to what is expected from known stellar populations and a smooth power-law extrapolation down to the brown dwarf regime. This excess has been interpreted as a population of ~Jupiter-mass objects that outnumber main-sequence stars by nearly twofold; however the microlensing data alone cannot distinguish between events due to wide-separation (a>~10 AU) and free-floating planets. Assuming these STEs are indeed due to planetary-mass objects, we aim to constrain the fraction of these events that can be explained by bound but wide-separation planets. We fit the observed timescale distribution with a lens mass function comprised of brown dwarfs, main-sequence stars, and stellar remnants, finding and thus corroborating the initial identification of an excess of STEs. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
