Do dark matter halos explain lensing peaks?
Jos\'e Manuel Zorrilla Matilla, Zolt\'an Haiman, Daniel Hsu, Arushi, Gupta, Andrea Petri

TL;DR
This study compares a halo-based model, Camelus, with N-body simulations for weak-lensing peak counts, revealing differences in peak predictions, the importance of covariance modeling, and implications for cosmological parameter estimation.
Contribution
The paper evaluates Camelus against N-body simulations, highlighting its strengths and limitations in predicting weak-lensing peaks for cosmology inference.
Findings
Camelus agrees with N-body for high S/N peaks
Significant differences near S/N=0 and in negative tail
Covariance estimation impacts parameter constraints
Abstract
We have investigated a recently proposed halo-based model, Camelus, for predicting weak-lensing peak counts, and compared its results over a collection of 162 cosmologies with those from N-body simulations. While counts from both models agree for peaks with (where is the ratio of the peak height to the r.m.s. shape noise), we find fewer counts for peaks near and significantly higher counts in the negative tail. Adding shape noise reduces the differences to within for all cosmologies. We also found larger covariances that are more sensitive to cosmological parameters. As a result, credibility regions in the are larger. Even though the credible contours are commensurate, each model draws its predictive power from different types of peaks. Low peaks, especially…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
