On the Power of Statistical Zero Knowledge
Adam Bouland, Lijie Chen, Dhiraj Holden, Justin Thaler, Prashant, Nalini Vasudevan

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limits of statistical zero knowledge proofs (SZK) and their variants, providing relativized evidence of their computational power and weaknesses through oracle constructions and complexity class separations.
Contribution
It presents the strongest known relativized evidence that SZK contains hard problems, and demonstrates that perfect zero knowledge proofs are weaker than general zero knowledge proofs.
Findings
SZK contains problems outside UPP in certain relativized worlds
PZK is not contained in coPZK relative to some oracles
NISZK is not contained in NIPZK in some relativized settings
Abstract
We examine the power of statistical zero knowledge proofs (captured by the complexity class SZK) and their variants. First, we give the strongest known relativized evidence that SZK contains hard problems, by exhibiting an oracle relative to which SZK (indeed, even NISZK) is not contained in the class UPP, containing those problems solvable by randomized algorithms with unbounded error. This answers an open question of Watrous from 2002 [Aar]. Second, we "lift" this oracle separation to the setting of communication complexity, thereby answering a question of G\"o\"os et al. (ICALP 2016). Third, we give relativized evidence that perfect zero knowledge proofs (captured by the class PZK) are weaker than general zero knowledge proofs. Specifically, we exhibit oracles relative to which SZK is not contained in PZK, NISZK is not contained in NIPZK, and PZK is not equal to coPZK. The first of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
