The connection between supernova remnants and the Galactic magnetic field: An analysis of quasi-parallel and quasi-perpendicular cosmic ray acceleration for the axisymmetric sample
J. L. West, S. Safi-Harb, and G. Ferrand

TL;DR
This study models 32 axisymmetric supernova remnants to analyze cosmic ray acceleration mechanisms, finding quasi-perpendicular acceleration aligns better with observed data, with SN1006 as a potential exception exhibiting both mechanisms.
Contribution
It introduces a coordinate transformation technique to simulate SNRs within the Galactic magnetic field and compares quasi-parallel and quasi-perpendicular acceleration models against observational data.
Findings
Quasi-perpendicular acceleration model fits data better than quasi-parallel.
SN1006 may involve both acceleration mechanisms simultaneously.
Simulation approach effectively reproduces SNR radio emission patterns.
Abstract
The mechanism for acceleration of cosmic rays in supernova remnants (SNRs) is an outstanding question in the field. We model a sample of 32 axisymmetric SNRs using the quasi-perpendicular and quasi-parallel cosmic-ray-electron (CRE) acceleration cases. The axisymmetric sample is defined to include SNRs with a double-sided, bilateral morphology, and also those with a one-sided morphology where one limb is much brighter than the other. Using a coordinate transformation technique, we insert a bubble-like model SNR into a model of the Galactic magnetic field. Since radio emission of SNRs is dominated by synchrotron emission and since this emission depends on the magnetic field and CRE distribution, we are able to simulate the SNRs emission and compare this to data. We find that the quasi-perpendicular CRE acceleration case is much more consistent with the data than the quasi-parallel CRE…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
