Extended relativistic configuration interaction and many-body perturbation calculations of spectroscopic data for the $n \leq 6$ configurationsin ne-like ions between Cr XV and Kr XXVII
Kai Wang, Zhan Bin Chen, Ran Si, Per J\"onsson, J\"orgen Ekman, Xue, Lin Guo, Shuang Li, Fei Yun Long, Wei Dang, Xiao Hui Zhao, Roger Hutton,, Chong Yang Chen, Jun Yan, and Xu Yang

TL;DR
This paper provides extensive relativistic configuration interaction and many-body perturbation calculations of spectroscopic data for Ne-like ions from Cr XV to Kr XXVII, significantly enhancing available data for astrophysical and plasma research.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive set of calculated spectroscopic data for high-n states in Ne-like ions, improving upon previous datasets with high accuracy and extensive coverage.
Findings
Mean energy difference with NIST data is only 0.05%.
Significantly increases accurate spectroscopic data for n>3 states.
Data useful for astrophysical observations and plasma modeling.
Abstract
Level energies, wavelengths, electric dipole, magnetic dipole, electric quadrupole, and magnetic quadrupole transition rates, oscillator strengths, and line strengths from combined relativistic configuration interaction and many-body perturbation calculations are reported for the 201 fine-structure states of the , , , , , , and configurations in all Ne-like ions between Cr XV and Kr XXVII. Calculated level energies and transition data are compared with experiments from the NIST and CHIANTI databases, and other recent benchmark calculations. The mean energy difference with the NIST experiments is only 0.05%. The present calculations significantly increase the amount of accurate spectroscopic data for the states in a number of Ne-like ions of astrophysics interest. A complete dataset should…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
