Value at risk and the diversification dogma
Arturo Erdely

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the risk diversification principle, demonstrating that its effectiveness depends on individual risk characteristics and their dependence structure, challenging the conventional wisdom that diversification is always beneficial.
Contribution
It provides a nuanced analysis showing that risk diversification is not universally advantageous and depends on specific risk features and their dependence relationships.
Findings
Diversification is not always optimal; depends on risk characteristics.
Dependence structure among risks influences diversification benefits.
Challenging the traditional view of diversification as universally beneficial.
Abstract
The so-called risk diversification principle is analyzed, showing that its convenience depends on individual characteristics of the risks involved and the dependence relationship among them. ----- Se analiza el principio de diversificaci\'on de riesgos y se demuestra que no siempre resulta mejor que no diversificar, pues esto depende de caracter\'isticas individuales de los riesgos involucrados, as\'i como de la relaci\'on de dependencia entre los mismos.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComparative International Legal Studies · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Risk Management in Financial Firms
