HAT-P-65b and HAT-P-66b: Two Transiting Inflated Hot Jupiters and Observational Evidence for the Re-Inflation of Close-In Giant Planets
Joel D. Hartman, G\'asp\'ar \'A. Bakos, Waqas Bhatti, Kaloyan Penev,, Allyson Bieryla, David W. Latham, G\'eza Kov\'acs, Guillermo Torres, Zoltan, Csubry, Miguel de Val-Borro, Lars Buchhave, Tam\'as Kov\'acs, Samuel Quinn,, Andrew W. Howard, Howard Isaacson, Benjamin J. Fulton

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery of two inflated hot Jupiters and provides observational evidence that close-in giant planets can re-inflate over time due to increasing stellar irradiation, challenging previous static models.
Contribution
It presents the first observational evidence supporting the re-inflation of close-in giant planets as their host stars evolve and become more luminous.
Findings
Significant correlation between planetary radii and host star fractional ages.
Planetary radii explained by current equilibrium temperatures and age-dependent re-inflation.
Supports models where deep interior energy deposition causes planetary re-inflation.
Abstract
We present the discovery of the transiting exoplanets HAT-P-65b and HAT-P-66b, with orbital periods of 2.6055 d and 2.9721 d, masses of M and M and inflated radii of R and R, respectively. They orbit moderately bright (, and ) stars of mass M and M. The stars are at the main sequence turnoff. While it is well known that the radii of close-in giant planets are correlated with their equilibrium temperatures, whether or not the radii of planets increase in time as their hosts evolve and become more luminous is an open question. Looking at the broader sample of well-characterized close-in transiting giant planets, we find that there is a statistically significant correlation between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
