A comparison of pivotal sampling and unequal probability sampling with replacement
Guillaume Chauvet (ENSAI, IRMAR), Anne Ruiz-Gazen (TSE)

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that pivotal sampling is more efficient than multinomial sampling, ensuring better estimator properties and supported by simulation results.
Contribution
It proves the efficiency of pivotal sampling over multinomial sampling and establishes related estimator properties.
Findings
Pivotal sampling is more efficient than multinomial sampling.
Horvitz-Thompson estimator is weakly consistent under pivotal sampling.
Simulation studies support the theoretical results.
Abstract
We prove that any implementation of pivotal sampling is more efficient than multinomial sampling. This property entails the weak consistency of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator and the existence of a conservative variance estimator. A small simulation study supports our findings.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
