Time Series Analysis of fMRI Data: Spatial Modelling and Bayesian Computation
Ming Teng, Timothy Johnson, Farouk Nathoo

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the accuracy of variational Bayes approximations in fMRI time series analysis with spatial modeling, comparing it to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, and highlights its reliability at high SNR but limitations at low SNR.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison between VB and HMC for spatially-varying coefficient models in fMRI data, clarifying when VB is appropriate and when HMC is necessary.
Findings
VB is computationally faster than HMC.
VB performs well at high SNR, producing similar results to HMC.
VB shows larger errors and less accuracy at low SNR.
Abstract
Time series analysis of fMRI data is an important area of medical statistics for neuroimaging data. The neuroimaging community has embraced mean-field variational Bayes (VB) approximations, which are implemented in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) software. While computationally efficient, the quality of VB approximations remains unclear even though they are commonly used in the analysis of neuroimaging data. For reliable statistical inference, it is important that these approximations be accurate and that users understand the scenarios under which they may not be accurate. We consider this issue for a particular model that includes spatially-varying coefficients. To examine the accuracy of the VB approximation we derive Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) for this model and conduct simulation studies to compare its performance with VB. As expected we find that the computation time…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Methods and Mixture Models · Statistical Methods and Inference · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
