From Nonstandard Analysis to various flavours of Computability Theory
Sam Sanders

TL;DR
This paper explores how theorems from Nonstandard Analysis can be translated into results in both classical and higher-order computability theory, expanding the scope of NSA's influence.
Contribution
It demonstrates that NSA theorems can be applied to classical computability theory through textbook proofs, complementing existing higher-order results.
Findings
NSA theorems yield classical computability results via textbook proofs
NSA results are applicable to higher-order computability theory
The paper bridges NSA and classical computability through proof analysis
Abstract
As suggested by the title, it has recently become clear that theorems of Nonstandard Analysis (NSA) give rise to theorems in computability theory (no longer involving NSA). Now, the aforementioned discipline divides into classical and higher-order computability theory, where the former (resp. the latter) sub-discipline deals with objects of type zero and one (resp. of all types). The aforementioned results regarding NSA deal exclusively with the higher-order case; we show in this paper that theorems of NSA also give rise to theorems in classical computability theory by considering so-called textbook proofs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
