Strong pinning of vortices by antiferromagnetic domain boundaries in CeCo(In$_{1-x}$Cd$_x$)$_5$
Dong-Jin Jang, Luis Pedrero, L. D. Pham, Z. Fisk, and Manuel Brando

TL;DR
This study investigates vortex pinning in CeCo(In$_{1-x}$Cd$_x$)$_5$, revealing that antiferromagnetic domain boundaries, rather than material defects, strongly pin vortices, especially evident through asymmetric peak effects at high fields.
Contribution
It demonstrates that vortex pinning in this compound is primarily due to antiferromagnetic domain boundaries, not crystallographic disorder, providing new insights into vortex behavior in magnetic superconductors.
Findings
Vortex pinning occurs at antiferromagnetic domain boundaries.
Asymmetric peak effect (ASPE) is linked to magnetic domain structures.
Pinning mechanism differs from conventional defect-based models.
Abstract
We have studied the isothermal magnetization of CeCo(InCd) with = 0.0075 and 0.01 down to 50 mK. Pronounced field-history dependent phenomena occur in the coexistence regime of the superconducting and antiferromagnetic phases. At low-fields, a phenomenological model of magnetic-flux entry well explains implying the dominance of bulk pinning effect. However, unless crystallographic quenched disorder is hysteretic, the asymmetric peak effect (ASPE) which appears at higher fields cannot be explained by the pinning of vortices due to material defects. Also the temperature dependence of the ASPE deviates from the conventional scenario for the peak effect. Comparison of our thermodynamic phase diagrams with those from previous neutron scattering and magnetoresistance experiments indicates that the pinning of vortices takes place at the field-history dependent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
