Note on "Equivalence Between Different Auxiliary Field Formulations of ${\cal N}=1$ Supergravity Coupled to Matter"
Shuntaro Aoki, Yusuke Yamada

TL;DR
This paper clarifies a correction to a previous claim that different auxiliary field formulations of 4D ${ m N}=1$ supergravity could be unified via a U(1) gauge symmetry, emphasizing the importance of accuracy in theoretical physics.
Contribution
The paper provides a correction to earlier work, refining the understanding of auxiliary field formulations in 4D ${ m N}=1$ supergravity and their relation to U(1) gauge symmetry.
Findings
The original unification claim was incorrect.
A critical error was identified in the previous formulation.
The correction clarifies the limitations of auxiliary field equivalences.
Abstract
In the version 1 of this paper, we claimed that 4D supergravity formulations with different auxiliary fields can be unified using U(1) gauge symmetry, whose gauge superfield does not have a kinetic term. However, after submission, we found a critical error in our statement. This is the note on the paper of the version 1.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
