Structural Simplicity as a Restraint on the Structure of Amorphous Silicon
Matthew J. Cliffe, Albert P. Bart\'ok, Rachel N. Kerber, Clare P., Grey, G\'abor Cs\'anyi, Andrew L. Goodwin

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that enforcing structural simplicity in modeling amorphous silicon leads to models that are consistent with experimental data and exhibit electronic properties, highlighting the importance of local homogeneity in amorphous materials.
Contribution
The study introduces a simplicity-based refinement approach that produces realistic amorphous silicon models without chemically specific restraints.
Findings
Simplest models are continuous random networks consistent with PDF data.
Structural simplicity correlates with electronic homogeneity and a pseudogap formation.
Method approaches state-of-the-art models using only homogeneity assumptions.
Abstract
Understanding the structural origins of the properties of amorphous materials remains one of the most important challenges in structural science. In this study we demonstrate that local 'structural simplicity', embodied by the degree to which atomic environments within a material are similar to each other, is powerful concept for rationalising the structure of canonical amorphous material amorphous silicon (a-Si). We show, by restraining a reverse Monte Carlo refinement against pair distribution function (PDF) data to be simpler, that the simplest model consistent with the PDF is a continuous random network (CRN). A further effect of producing a simple model of a-Si is the generation of a (pseudo)gap in the electronic density of states, suggesting that structural homogeneity drives electronic homogeneity. That this method produces models of a-Si that approach the state-of-the-art…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
