RoboPol: The optical polarization of gamma-ray--loud and gamma-ray--quiet blazars
E. Angelakis, T. Hovatta, D. Blinov, V. Pavlidou, S. Kiehlmann, I., Myserlis, M. Boettcher, P. Mao, G. V. Panopoulou, I. Liodakis, O. G. King, M., Balokovic, A. Kus, N. Kylafis, A. Mahabal, A. Marecki, E. Paleologou, I., Papadakis, I. Papamastorakis, E. Pazderski, T. J. Pearson

TL;DR
This study compares optical polarization properties of gamma-ray--loud and gamma-ray--quiet blazars, revealing higher polarization fractions in gamma-ray--loud sources and correlations with synchrotron peak frequency.
Contribution
It provides the first systematic comparison of optical polarization between gamma-ray--loud and gamma-ray--quiet blazars, highlighting differences linked to their emission properties.
Findings
Gamma-ray--loud blazars have higher polarization fractions than gamma-ray--quiet ones.
Polarization fraction correlates with synchrotron-peak-frequency, with high-peaked sources showing lower and more uniform polarization.
The polarization angle variability depends on the synchrotron peak frequency, indicating different magnetic field structures.
Abstract
We present average R-band optopolarimetric data, as well as variability parameters, from the first and second RoboPol observing season. We investigate whether gamma- ray--loud and gamma-ray--quiet blazars exhibit systematic differences in their optical polarization properties. We find that gamma-ray--loud blazars have a systematically higher polarization fraction (0.092) than gamma-ray--quiet blazars (0.031), with the hypothesis of the two samples being drawn from the same distribution of polarization fractions being rejected at the 3{\sigma} level. We have not found any evidence that this discrepancy is related to differences in the redshift distribution, rest-frame R-band lu- minosity density, or the source classification. The median polarization fraction versus synchrotron-peak-frequency plot shows an envelope implying that high synchrotron- peaked sources have a smaller range of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
