Can we Falsify the Consciousness-Causes-Collapse Hypothesis in Quantum Mechanics?
J. Acacio de Barros, Gary Oas

TL;DR
This paper critically evaluates proposals to disprove the consciousness-causes-collapse hypothesis in quantum mechanics, demonstrating their flaws and arguing that the hypothesis is unfalsifiable under reasonable assumptions.
Contribution
It provides a general experimental framework showing the hypothesis cannot be empirically falsified, challenging its scientific testability.
Findings
Proposals to disprove the hypothesis are fundamentally flawed.
A general experimental setup cannot disprove the hypothesis.
The hypothesis is unfalsifiable under reasonable assumptions.
Abstract
In this paper we examine some proposals to disprove the hypothesis that the interaction between mind and matter causes the collapse of the wave function, showing that such proposals are fundamentally flawed. We then describe a general experimental setup retaining the key features of the ones examined, and show that even a more general case is inadequate to disprove the mind-matter collapse hypothesis. Finally, we use our setup provided to argue that, under some reasonable assumptions about consciousness, such hypothesis is unfalsifiable.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Biofield Effects and Biophysics
