The magnitude and direction of collider bias for binary variables
Trang Quynh Nguyen, Allan Dafoe, Elizabeth L. Ogburn

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how conditioning on colliders in binary variable settings induces bias, providing formulas for its magnitude and sign to inform causal inference and bias correction.
Contribution
It derives explicit formulas and conditions for the magnitude and direction of collider bias in binary variables, enhancing understanding of selection bias effects.
Findings
Derived formulas for collider bias magnitude in binary variables.
Provided conditions to determine the bias's sign.
Analyzed bias resulting from conditioning and regression adjustment.
Abstract
Suppose we are interested in the effect of variable on variable . If and both influence, or are associated with variables that influence, a common outcome, called a collider, then conditioning on the collider (or on a variable influenced by the collider -- its "child") induces a spurious association between and , which is known as collider bias. Characterizing the magnitude and direction of collider bias is crucial for understanding the implications of selection bias and for adjudicating decisions about whether to control for variables that are known to be associated with both exposure and outcome but could be either confounders or colliders. Considering a class of situations where all variables are binary, and where and either are, or are respectively influenced by, two marginally independent causes of a collider, we derive collider bias that results from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
