On the nature of bright compact radio sources at z>4.5
Rocco Coppejans (1), S\'andor Frey (2), D\'avid Cseh (1), Cornelia, M\"uller (1), Zsolt Paragi (3), Heino Falcke (1,4), Krisztina \'E. Gab\'anyi, (2,5), Leonid I. Gurvits (3,6), Tao An (7,8), Oleg Titov (9) ((1) Department, of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University

TL;DR
This study expands the sample of high-redshift (z>4.5) radio-loud quasars observed with VLBI, revealing their diverse spectral properties and suggesting classifications into flat-spectrum quasars and GPS/MPS sources, aiding understanding of early universe galaxy evolution.
Contribution
The paper increases the number of VLBI-imaged z>4.5 radio sources by 50%, providing a larger dataset to analyze their spectral and structural properties.
Findings
27 sources classified based on spectral indices and brightness temperatures
13 sources identified as flat-spectrum radio quasars
Steep-spectrum sources are likely off-axis GPS/MPS sources
Abstract
High-redshift radio-loud quasars are used to, among other things, test the predictions of cosmological models, set constraints on black hole growth in the early universe and understand galaxy evolution. Prior to this paper, 20 extragalactic radio sources at redshifts above 4.5 have been imaged with very long baseline interferometry (VLBI). Here we report on observations of an additional ten z>4.5 sources at 1.7 and 5 GHz with the European VLBI Network (EVN), thereby increasing the number of imaged sources by 50%. Combining our newly observed sources with those from the literature, we create a substantial sample of 30 z>4.5 VLBI sources, allowing us to study the nature of these objects. Using spectral indices, variability and brightness temperatures, we conclude that of the 27 sources with sufficient information to classify, the radio emission from one source is from star formation, 13…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
