Some Statistics concerning the Austrian Presidential Election 2016
Erich Neuwirth, Walter Schachermayer

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the 2016 Austrian presidential election, demonstrating that despite irregularities in vote counting, the probability of reversing the result is extremely low, supporting the decision to repeat the election.
Contribution
It provides a statistical assessment of the impact of irregular votes on the election outcome, supporting legal decisions with quantitative analysis.
Findings
Irregular votes constituted 77,769 ballots.
The probability of irregular votes reversing the result is extremely low.
Supports the court's decision to repeat the election based on statistical evidence.
Abstract
The 2016 Austrian presidential runoff election has been repealed by the Austrian constitutional court. The results of the counted votes had yielded a victory of Alexander van der Bellen by a margin of 30.863 votes as compared to the votes for Norbert Hofer. However, the constitutional court found that 77.769 votes were "contaminated" as there have been -- at least on a formal level - violations of the legal procedure when counting those votes. For example, the envelopes were opened prematurely, or not all the members of the electoral board were present during the counting etc. Hence the court considered the scenario that the irregular counting of these votes might have caused a reversal of the result as possible. The constitutional court sentenced that this possibility presents a sufficient irregularity in order to order a repetition of the entire election. While it is, of course,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
