A two-component generalization of the reduced Ostrovsky equation and its integrable semi-discrete analogue
Bao-Feng Feng, Ken-ichi Maruno, Yasuhiro Ohta

TL;DR
This paper introduces a two-component generalization of the reduced Ostrovsky equation, explores its integrability via Lax pairs, derives soliton solutions, and constructs an integrable semi-discrete analogue with explicit solutions.
Contribution
It presents a novel two-component reduced Ostrovsky equation, its bilinear form, soliton solutions, and an integrable semi-discrete version derived through a discrete hodograph transform.
Findings
The two-component reduced Ostrovsky equation is integrable and admits explicit soliton solutions.
An extended BKP hierarchy underpins the derivation of the equation and its solutions.
An integrable semi-discrete analogue of the equation is constructed with explicit N-soliton solutions.
Abstract
In the present paper, we propose a two-component generalization of the reduced Ostrovsky equation, whose differential form can be viewed as the short-wave limit of a two-component Degasperis-Procesi (DP) equation. They are integrable due to the existence of Lax pairs. Moreover, we have shown that two-component reduced Ostrovsky equation can be reduced from an extended BKP hierarchy with negative flow through a pseudo 3-reduction and a hodograph (reciprocal) transform. As a by-product, its bilinear form and -soliton solution in terms of pfaffians are presented. One- and two-soliton solutions are provided and analyzed. In the second part of the paper, we start with a modified BKP hierarchy, which is a B\"acklund transformation of the above extended BKP hierarchy, an integrable semi-discrete analogue of two-component reduced Ostrovsky equation is constructed by defining an appropriate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
