On the complexity of failed zero forcing
Yaroslav Shitov

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of the failed forcing number in graphs, proving it is NP-hard to compute, which advances understanding of graph forcing processes and related invariants.
Contribution
It establishes the NP-hardness of computing the failed forcing number and extends the result to the skew failed forcing number, answering a recent open question.
Findings
Failed forcing number is NP-hard to compute.
The NP-hardness result applies to the skew failed forcing number.
The proof addresses an open problem in graph forcing theory.
Abstract
Let be a simple graph whose vertices are partitioned into two subsets, called filled vertices and empty vertices. A vertex is said to be forced by a filled vertex if is a unique empty neighbor of . If we can fill all the vertices of by repeatedly filling the forced ones, then we call an initial set of filled vertices a forcing set. We discuss the so-called failed forcing number of a graph, which is the largest cardinality of a set which is not forcing. Answering the recent question of Ansill, Jacob, Penzellna, Saavedra, we prove that this quantity is NP-hard to compute. Our proof also works for a related graph invariant which is called the skew failed forcing number.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
