Geometrically Exact Finite Element Formulations for Curved Slender Beams: Kirchhoff-Love Theory vs. Simo-Reissner Theory
Christoph Meier, Wolfgang A. Wall, Alexander Popp

TL;DR
This paper develops and compares novel geometrically exact Kirchhoff-Love finite element formulations for slender beams with existing Simo-Reissner models, demonstrating improved accuracy and solver performance for highly slender beam problems.
Contribution
It introduces four new Kirchhoff-Love finite element variants with strong or weak constraint enforcement and different triad parametrizations, fulfilling key large-deformation and objectivity requirements.
Findings
Kirchhoff-Love elements show lower discretization errors.
Proposed formulations exhibit better nonlinear solver performance.
Shear-free Kirchhoff-Love models are advantageous for highly slender beams.
Abstract
The present work focuses on geometrically exact finite elements for highly slender beams. It aims at the proposal of novel formulations of Kirchhoff-Love type, a detailed review of existing formulations of Kirchhoff-Love and Simo-Reissner type as well as a careful evaluation and comparison of the proposed and existing formulations. Two different rotation interpolation schemes with strong or weak Kirchhoff constraint enforcement, respectively, as well as two different choices of nodal triad parametrizations in terms of rotation or tangent vectors are proposed. The combination of these schemes leads to four novel finite element variants, all of them based on a C1-continuous Hermite interpolation of the beam centerline. Essential requirements such as representability of general 3D, large-deformation, dynamic problems involving slender beams with arbitrary initial curvatures and anisotropic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
