4-dimensional analogues of Dehn's lemma
Arunima Ray, Daniel Ruberman

TL;DR
This paper explores 4-dimensional analogues of Dehn's lemma, showing conditions under which spheres and tori in 4-manifolds bound embedded balls or tori, highlighting differences between smooth and topological categories.
Contribution
It provides new examples and results on when spheres and tori in 4-manifolds bound embedded or immersed balls and tori, revealing distinctions between smooth and topological embeddings.
Findings
Essential 2-spheres may not extend to embedded balls in smooth 4-manifolds.
In topological category, certain spheres bound embedded balls in homology sphere boundaries.
Constructs examples of incompressible tori that extend to maps but not embeddings in 4-manifolds.
Abstract
We investigate certain -dimensional analogues of the classical -dimensional Dehn's lemma, giving examples where such analogues do or do not hold, in the smooth and topological categories. In particular, we show that an essential -sphere in the boundary of a simply connected -manifold such that is null-homotopic in need not extend to an embedding of a ball in . However, if is simply connected (or more generally a -manifold with abelian fundamental group) with boundary a homology sphere, then bounds a topologically embedded ball in . Moreover, we give examples where such an does not bound any smoothly embedded ball in . In a similar vein, we construct incompressible tori where is a contractible -manifold such that extends to a map of a solid torus in , but not to any embedding of a solid torus in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
