Comment on "No-core configuration-interaction model for the isospin- and angular-momentum-projected states" by Satu{\l}a, Baczyk, Dobaczewski, and Konieczka
I. Bentley, K. Neerg{\aa}rd, S. Frauendorf

TL;DR
This paper clarifies a misinterpretation in previous work, correcting the understanding of recent results related to the no-core configuration-interaction model for nuclear states.
Contribution
It provides a critical comment that rectifies a misinterpretation of Carlsson and Toivanen's results regarding the model.
Findings
Clarifies the misinterpretation of Carlsson and Toivanen's results
Reaffirms the original conclusions of the authors' work
Highlights the importance of accurate interpretation in theoretical physics
Abstract
The authors state that results recently published by Carlsson and Toivanen "seem to contradict" the conclusions of some of our work. We show that this statement is based on a misinterpretation of the results of Carlsson and Toivanen.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
