Implications of quantum ambiguities in k=1 loop quantum cosmology: distinct quantum turnarounds and the super-Planckian regime
John L. Dupuy, Parampreet Singh

TL;DR
This paper compares two quantization methods in loop quantum cosmology, revealing differences in quantum turnarounds, energy densities, and the potential for cyclic universes, with implications for understanding quantum gravitational effects in cosmology.
Contribution
It demonstrates the phenomenological differences between holonomy and connection quantizations in closed FLRW models, including the existence of distinct quantum turnarounds and super-Planckian regimes.
Findings
Connection quantization yields two distinct quantum turnarounds.
Holonomy quantization generally limits energy density, but extreme values can occur.
Pure quantum cyclic universes are possible under certain initial conditions.
Abstract
The spatially closed Friedmann-Lema\^{i}tre-Robertson-Walker model in loop quantum cosmology admits two inequivalent consistent quantizations: one based on expressing the field strength in terms of the holonomies over closed loops, and, another using a connection operator and open holonomies. Using the effective dynamics, we investigate the phenomenological differences between the two quantizations for the single fluid and the two fluid scenarios with various equations of state, including the phantom matter. We show that a striking difference between the two quantizations is the existence of two distinct quantum turnarounds, either bounces or recollapses, in the connection quantization, in contrast to a single distinct quantum bounce or a recollapse in the holonomy quantization. These results generalize an earlier result on the existence of two distinct quantum bounces for stiff matter…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
