Wide-Band Spectra of Giant Radio Pulses from the Crab Pulsar
Ryo Mikami, Katsuaki Asano, Shuta J. Tanaka, Shota Kisaka, Mamoru, Sekido, Kazuhiro Takefuji, Hiroshi Takeuchi, Hiroaki Misawa, Fuminori, Tsuchiya, Hajime Kita, Yoshinori Yonekura, Toshio Terasawa

TL;DR
This study presents wide-band spectral observations of giant radio pulses from the Crab pulsar across multiple frequencies, revealing spectral diversity, correlations with fluence, and implications for fast radio burst models.
Contribution
It provides the most wide-band samples of Crab pulsar giant radio pulses and analyzes their spectral properties and correlations, advancing understanding of their emission mechanisms.
Findings
Most GRP spectra follow single power laws from 0.3 to 2.2 GHz.
A significant number of GRPs have hard spectra with spectral index around -1.
More energetic GRPs tend to have softer spectra.
Abstract
We present the results of the simultaneous observation of the giant radio pulses (GRPs) from the Crab pulsar at 0.3, 1.6, 2.2, 6.7, and 8.4 GHz with four telescopes in Japan. We obtain 3194 and 272 GRPs occurring at the main pulse and the interpulse phases, respectively. A few GRPs detected at both 0.3 and 8.4 GHz are the most wide-band samples ever reported. In the frequency range from 0.3 to 2.2 GHz, we find that about 70\% or more of the GRP spectra are consistent with single power laws and the spectral indices of them are distributed from to . We also find that a significant number of GRPs have such a hard spectral index (approximately ) that the fluence at 0.3 GHz is below the detection limit ("dim-hard" GRPs). Stacking light curves of such dim-hard GRPs at 0.3 GHz, we detect consistent enhancement compared to the off-GRP light curve. Our samples show apparent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
