The chaotic four-body problem in Newtonian gravity I: Identical point-particles
Nathan W. C. Leigh, Nicholas C. Stone, Aaron M. Geller, Michael M., Shara, Harsha Muddu, Diana Solano-Oropeza, Yancey Thomas

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the chaotic four-body problem in Newtonian gravity with identical point particles, developing an analytic formalism for outcome probabilities and velocity distributions, and comparing these with numerical simulations.
Contribution
It introduces a formalism for calculating outcome probabilities and velocity distributions in four-body encounters, extending previous three-body models and validated through simulations.
Findings
Distinct velocity distributions for each encounter outcome.
Analytic predictions match simulations for stable triples at low virial ratios.
Single star escape velocities follow a predictable distribution similar to the three-body case.
Abstract
In this paper, we study the chaotic four-body problem in Newtonian gravity. Assuming point particles and total encounter energies 0, the problem has three possible outcomes. We describe each outcome as a series of discrete transformations in energy space, using the diagrams first presented in Leigh \& Geller (2012; see the Appendix). Furthermore, we develop a formalism for calculating probabilities for these outcomes to occur, expressed using the density of escape configurations per unit energy, and based on the Monaghan description originally developed for the three-body problem. We compare this analytic formalism to results from a series of binary-binary encounters with identical point particles, simulated using the \texttt{FEWBODY} code. Each of our three encounter outcomes produces a unique velocity distribution for the escaping star(s). Thus, these distributions can…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
