A new $G$-parity violating amplitude in the $J/\psi$ decay?
R. Baldini Ferroli, F. De Mori, M. Destefanis, M. Maggiora, S., Pacetti, L. Yan, M. Bertani, A. Calcaterra, G. Felici, P. Patteri, Y. D., Wang, A. Zallo, D. Bettoni, G. Cibinetto, R. Farinelli, E. Fioravanti, I., Garzia, G. Mezzadri, V. Santoro, M. Savri\'e, F. Bianchi, M. Greco

TL;DR
This paper investigates an unexpected decay rate of the $J/\psi$ meson into pions, suggesting a possible new $G$-parity violating mechanism involving two-gluon plus one-photon decay, which could challenge existing electromagnetic decay expectations.
Contribution
It proposes a novel $G$-parity violating decay mechanism for $J/\psi$ involving two-gluon plus one-photon processes, explaining the observed excess in decay rate beyond electromagnetic predictions.
Findings
Measured branching fraction exceeds electromagnetic expectation by 3.9 standard deviations.
Two-gluon plus one-photon decay mechanism could account for the discrepancy.
Future BESIII measurements can confirm or refute this $G$-parity violation hypothesis.
Abstract
The meson has negative -parity so that, in the limit of isospin conservation, its decay into should be purely electromagnetic. However, the measured branching fraction exceeds by more than 3.9 standard deviations the expectation computed according to BaBar data on the cross section. The possibility that the two-gluon plus one-photon decay mechanism is not suppressed by -parity conservation is discussed, even by considering other multi-pion decay channels. As also obtained by phenomenological computation, such a decay mechanism could be responsible for the observed discrepancy. Finally, we notice that the BESIII experiment, having the potential to perform an accurate measurement of the cross section in the 3 GeV energy region, can definitely prove or disprove this strong…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
