Why $\Xi(1690)$ and $\Xi(2120)$ are so narrow?
K. P. Khemchandani, A. Mart\'inez Torres, A. Hosaka, H. Nagahiro, F., S. Navarra, and M. Nielsen

TL;DR
This paper explains the narrow widths of certain $\\Xi$ baryons, like $\\Xi(1690)$ and $\\Xi(2120)$, through coupled channel meson-baryon dynamics using chiral and hidden local symmetry models.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical explanation for the narrow widths of specific $\\Xi$ baryons based on hadron dynamics, matching experimental data.
Findings
The narrow width of $\\Xi(1690)$ is explained by coupled channel dynamics.
A new narrow resonance related to $\\Xi(2120)$ is identified.
No exotic $\\Xi^{+}$ or $\\Xi^{--}$ states are found.
Abstract
The baryons are expected to be naturally narrower as compared to their nonstrange and strange counterparts since they have only one light quark and, thus, their decay involves producing either a light meson and doubly strange baryon or both meson and baryon with strangeness which involves, relatively, more energy. In fact, some 's have full widths of the order of even 10-20 MeV when, in principle, they have a large phase space to decay to some open channels. Such is the case of , for which the width has been found to be of the order of 10 MeV in the latest {\it BABAR} and BELLE data. In this manuscript we study why some 's are so narrow. Based on a coupled channel calculation of the pseudoscalar meson-baryon and vector meson-baryon systems with chiral and hidden local symmetry Lagrangians, we find that the answer lies in the intricate hadron dynamics. We find…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
