Exploring plausible formation scenarios for the planet candidate orbiting Proxima Centauri
Gavin A. L. Coleman, Richard P. Nelson, Sijme-Jan Paardekooper, Stefan, Dreizler, Benjamin Giesers, Guillem Anglada-Escude

TL;DR
This study compares four formation scenarios for Proxima b, predicting differences in system multiplicity, water content, and orbital eccentricity to guide future observational tests of its origin.
Contribution
It introduces and evaluates four distinct formation models for Proxima b, highlighting their unique predictions for system architecture and planetary composition.
Findings
In situ formation predicts a multi-planet system with eccentric orbits.
Migration and collision scenarios suggest multiple planets with possible resonances.
Pebble accretion outside the snowline results in a dry, circular orbit planet.
Abstract
We present a study of four different formation scenarios that may be able to explain the origin of the recently announced planet (`Proxima b') orbiting Proxima Centauri. The aim is to examine how the formation scenarios differ in their predictions for the multiplicity of the Proxima system, the water/volatile content of Proxima b and its orbital eccentricity, so that these can be tested by future observations. A scenario of in situ formation via giant impacts from a locally enhanced disc of planetary embryos/planetesimals predicts that Proxima b will be in a multiplanet system with a measurably finite eccentricity. Assuming that the local solid enhancement needed to form a Proxima b analogue arises because of the inwards drift of solids in the form of small planetesimals/boulders, this scenario also results in Proxima b analogues being only moderately endowed with water/volatiles. A…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
